Skip to main content
Update of the Industrial strategy for Europe
Foreign Subsidies Regulation

Addressing distortions in the Single Market caused by foreign financial contributions

What is a foreign subsidy?

Why foreign subsidies can distort the Single Market

Foreign subsidies can give their recipients an unfair advantage to acquire companies or to obtain public procurement contracts in the EU. Recipients of foreign subsidies have the potential to crowd-out non-subsidised companies, harm innovation, and negatively impact the quality and choice of consumer goods and services.

Examples of distortive foreign subsidies

  • Capital Markets, Paris Financial Centre and Stock Exchange, France
    Subsidised concentration

    A company wishes to acquire an EU target. Such acquisition is supported by a non-EU government through a direct grant and a beneficial State guarantee on a loan to the acquirer. These subsidies make it easier for the acquirer to finance the acquisition and to outbid potential competitors who also want to acquire the EU target company.

  • Corporate and office relations
    Public procurement

    A company intends to submit a bid in a public tender organised by a contracting authority in an EU Member State for a major project. The company is supported by the government of a non-EU country through direct subsidies. As a result, the company is able to make an offer at a low price that it would not have been able to make without the subsidy, thereby undercutting competitors. 

  • Operation to fight cigarette smuggling in Latvia
    Own-initiative (ex-officio) case

    An EU subsidiary of a non-EU-country parent company has access to cheap, State-supported financing in the non-EU country of the parent company, for example in the form of unlimited State guarantees or direct financial grants. The cheap financing allows the EU subsidiary to set up factories in the EU and crowd out competitors that do not benefit from subsidies.

The Foreign Subsidies Regulation (FSR)

The EU plays an important role in ensuring fair and undistorted market conditions in the Single Market.

The new legislation aims to address the regulatory disparities between aid granted by EU Member States and subsidies granted by non-EU governments. The former is subjected to close scrutiny, while until now, there have been no comparable rules for subsidies from non-EU countries.

The FSR allows the Commission to investigate financial contributions granted by non-EU authorities to companies active in the EU.

Tools available against distortive foreign subsidies

If the Commission identifies the existence of foreign subsidies which distort competition in the EU, action may be taken using the following tools:

  • concentration

    An ex-ante notification obligation for concentrations involving a financial contribution by a non-EU government, where (i) the EU turnover of the company to be acquired, at least one of the merging parties or the joint venture is of at least €500 million and (ii) the foreign financial contribution reaches at least €50 million.

  • public tender

    An ex-ante notification obligation for public procurement procedures where (i) the contract value is at least €250 million and (ii) the bid involves a foreign financial contribution of at least €4 million per non-EU country.

  • market

    For all other market situations, the Commission can start investigations on its own initiative (ex-officio), including the possibility to request ad-hoc notification for smaller concentrations and public procurement procedures.

With respect to the two notification tools, the acquirer or bidder will have to notify ex-ante financial contributions received from non-EU governments and public authorities in relation to concentrations or public procurements meeting the relevant thresholds. Pending the Commission’s review and approval, the concentration in question cannot be completed. In public procurement procedures, the investigated bidder cannot be awarded the contract (standstill obligation) until the end of the investigation or the time limit elapses.

The Commission will also be able to request ad-hoc notifications for concentrations and public procurement procedures below the relevant thresholds if it suspects that foreign subsidies may have been involved in the transaction and the transaction is not yet concluded. In public procurement procedures, this also applies if the Commission receives new information leading it to suspect that a submitted notification or declaration was incomplete, or where such a notification or declaration is not transferred to the Commission. In case of an ad-hoc notification, the concentration or public procurement procedure concerned will be subject to the same standstill obligation as described above.

The general investigation tool (ex-officio) will allow the Commission to investigate on its own initiative any type of economic activities and market situations, such as greenfield investment or the provision of services, when it suspects that a foreign subsidy may be involved.

Structure of the assessment

The procedure to investigate foreign subsidies will involve a preliminary review and, if there is sufficient evidence of a distortive foreign subsidy, an in-depth investigation.

  • The Commission will assess whether a financial contribution by a non-EU government constitutes a foreign subsidy within the meaning of the FSR and whether it distorts the Single Market.
  • If it does, the Commission will balance the negative effects in terms of the distortion with the positive effects of the foreign subsidy on the development of the relevant subsidised economic activity.
  • When the negative effects outweigh the positive effects, the Commission can impose redressive measures or accept commitments from the companies concerned to remedy the distortion.
Visual foreign subsidies regulation
  • procedure
    How will the procedure work?

    Specific ex-ante notification

    • Concentrations (>€500m EU turnover and > €50m foreign contribution)
    • Bids in procurement (>€250m and >€4m contribution per non-EU country)

    General screening tool

    • Ex-officio
    • Any market situation
  • assessment
    How will the Commission assess possible distortions?

    Categories of subsidies most likely to be distortive

    • Unlimited guarantees
    • Subsidies to an ailing company without a restructuring plan
    • Subsidies directly facilitating a concentration
    • Subsidies enabling an unduly advantageous tender
    • Export financing not in line with OECD Arrangement on officially supported export credits

    Indicators of a distortion

    • Amount and nature of subsidy
    • Situation of the company, including its size, and the market or sectors concerned
    • Level and evolution of economic activity on the internal market
    • Purpose, conditions and use of the subsidy

    Subsidies unlikely to be distortive

    • The amount is less than €4 million/3 years

    Subsidies considered non-distortive

    • The amount is less than the thresholds for de minimis aid under EU State aid rules
    • Subsidies aimed at making good damages caused by natural disasters or exceptional occurrences
  • balance
    What is the balancing test?

    This test considers whether distortive effects of a foreign subsidy are mitigated by the positive effects on the development of the relevant subsidised economic activity. It helps to decide whether to impose redressive measures or to accept commitments, as well as the nature and level of possible redressive measures or commitments.

  • remedy
    What redressive measures will the Commission have the power to impose?
    • Impose structural or non-structural redressive measures (e.g. divestment of assets, access to infrastructure, prohibition of certain market behaviour)
    • Accept commitments offered by the company
    • Prohibit subsidised concentration or award of procurement to the subsidised bidder

Milestones of the initiative

  1. 21-22 March 2019

    In its conclusions, the European Council asked the Commission to identify new tools to address distortive effects of foreign subsidies on the Single Market

  2. February 2020

    In its report on competition policy, the European Parliament called on the Commission to explore new tools to address distortions due to subsidies

  3. 17 June 2020

    Commission adopts a White paper on foreign subsidies to launch a public debate

  4. 23 September 2020

    14-week public consultation ends, 150 respondents submitted their views

  5. 6 October 2020

    Commission publishes Inception impact assessment for a legislative proposal

  6. October 2020 – January 2021

    Commission gathers stakeholder feedback in a targeted consultation

  7. 3 March 2021

    Regulatory Scrutiny Board issues a positive opinion on the Impact Assessment report

  8. 5 May 2021

    The Commission adopts a Proposal for a Regulation on distortive foreign subsidies

  9. 30 June 2022

    The European Parliament and the Council reach a political agreement on the text of the Foreign Subsidies Regulation

  10. November 2022

    The final text of the Regulation is adopted on 10 November 2022 by the Parliament and on 28 November 2022 by the Council

  11. 12 January 2023

    The Foreign Subsidies Regulation enters into force

     

  12. January 2023

    The Commission presents a draft Implementing Regulation and notification forms, followed by a 4-week stakeholder feedback period

  13. 12 July 2023

    The Foreign Subsidies Regulation starts to apply. The Commission can start ex officio investigations

  14. 12 October 2023

    The notification obligation for concentrations and public procurement above certain thresholds starts to apply

Documents

  • 13 JANUARY 2023
Regulation on foreign subsidies distorting the internal market

 

  • 5 MAY 2021
Press release: Commission proposes new Regulation to address distortions caused by foreign subsidies in the Single Market

 

  • 5 MAY 2021
Questions and Answers: Distortive foreign subsidies

 

  • 5 MAY 2021
Impact Assessment report on distortive foreign subsidies

 

  • 5 MAY 2021
Executive summary of the Impact Assessment report: Distortive foreign subsidies

 

  • 5 MAY 2021
Opinion of the Regulatory Scrutiny Board: Distortive foreign subsidies

This page was last updated on 8 February 2023