(*) Key achievements in the table state which period they relate to. Some come from the implementation of the predecessor programmes under the 2014-2020 multiannual financial framework. This is expected and is due to the multiannual life cycle of EU programmes and the projects they finance, where results often follow only after completion of the programmes.
Budget for 2021-2027
[notranslate]EGFWeb:budg_01:pie[/notranslate]
Rationale and design of the programme
With a view to achieving economic, social and territorial cohesion in the EU, it is necessary to develop a coordinated strategy for employment. This strategy should particularly focus on the promotion of a skilled, trained and adaptable workforce as well as on labour markets’ responsiveness to economic change. To this end, the Union shall contribute to a high level of employment by supporting and, if necessary, complementing Member State’s action through the mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund for Displaced Workers (EGF) to co-finance measures to support redundant workers in case of major restructuring events. These events, by their scale and effects, cause a significant impact and can test the limits of what regular national labour market programmes are able to provide to assist displaced workers.
Globalisation and technological change are likely to increase further the interconnectedness and interdependence of world economies. Labour reallocation is an integral and inevitable part of such economic change. These trends risk further tilting the already unequal distribution of the benefits from globalisation, causing a significant impact on the people and regions adversely affected.
Ensuring a fair distribution of the benefits of change calls for offering assistance to displaced workers. When the number of displaced workers is particularly large, providing assistance may go beyond the means of the individual Member State, requiring EU-level action. In particular, EU intervention through the EGF generates European added value by increasing the number, variety and intensity of services offered to even more dismissed workers and for a longer period of time than would be possible without EGF funding.
The EGF aims at supporting socioeconomic transformations that are the result of globalisation and of technological advance as well as of environmental changes by helping displaced workers and self‑employed persons whose activity has ceased to adapt to structural change.
The EGF is an emergency fund that operates reactively to assist displaced workers affected by major restructuring events. It is guided by—and helps implement—the principles defined under the European Pillar of Social Rights (1) (including equal opportunities and access to the labour market, fair working conditions, and social protection and inclusion) and enhances social and economic cohesion among regions and Member States. It adds to existing mainstream restructuring assistance programmes and services for labour market actors, without replacing existing resources.
The EGF’s objectives are to demonstrate solidarity and promote decent and sustainable employment by helping in the case of major restructuring events. Emphasis shall be placed on measures that help the most disadvantaged groups.
The EGF co-finances coordinated packages of personalised services designed to facilitate the re-integration of the beneficiaries, the most disadvantaged among them, into employment or self-employment. Its focus is on active labour market measures (e.g., training and retraining, up-skilling, job-search assistance and guidance, outplacement assistance, aid for self-employment or business start ups, temporary financial incentives and allowances). Assistance is granted for a limited period.
The EGF is implemented under shared management. DG Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion is the lead for the Commission.
The employment policies are a shared competence between the EU and the Member States ( 2). The two parties shall work towards developing a coordinated strategy for employment and particularly for promoting a skilled, trained and adaptable workforce, and labour markets’ responsiveness to economic change with a view to achieving economic, social and territorial cohesion in the EU. The EU will contribute to a high level of employment by supporting and, if necessary, complementing action by Member States ( 3).
In compliance with the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality (4), funding from the EU budget concentrates on activities whose objectives cannot be sufficiently achieved by the Member States alone and where EU intervention can bring additional value compared to action by Member States alone.
Therefore, the mobilisation of the EGF to co-finance measures to support redundant workers can be justified in case of major restructuring events that, by their scale and effects, cause a significant impact and can test the limits of what regular national labour market programmes are able to provide to assist displaced workers. Assistance from the EGF is always offered in addition to the efforts of the Member States at a national, regional and local level. The EGF generates European added value by increasing the number, variety and intensity of services offered to even more dismissed workers and for a longer period of time than would be possible without EGF funding ( 5)( 6).
The 2021-2027 multiannual financial framework (7), the Interinstitutional Agreements on Better Law-Making (8) between the European Parliament, the Council of the European Union and the European Commission, and the Interinstitutional Agreement between the European Parliament, the Council of the European Union and the European Commission on budgetary discipline, on cooperation in budgetary matters and on sound financial management, as well as on new own resources, including a roadmap towards the introduction of new own resources, of 16 December 2020 (9), determine the budgetary framework of the EGF. The objective, scope and conditions for the mobilisation are set out in the EGF regulation (10). For each eligible case, the EGF is mobilised jointly by the European Parliament and the Council through a decision adopted in accordance with the provisions of the EGF regulation and a transfer from the reserve budget line to the EGF operational budget line.
The EGF’s design shows a clear complementarity with the more preventive assistance offered by the European Social Fund Plus which consists of multiannual programmes that support long-term goals such as the anticipation and management of changes and restructuring. Unlike the European Social Fund Plus, the EGF is established to provide support in exceptional circumstances and outside a multiannual programming scheme. EGF and European Social Fund Plus measures are sometimes used by Member States to complement each other to provide both short- and long-term solutions (11).
(1)European Pillar of Social Rights action plan.
(2)Articles 2 to 5 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.
(3) Articles 145 and 147 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.
(4) Article 5 of the Treaties (2002) C 325/01.
(5) Mid-Term Evaluation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund (EGF) 2014-2020.
(6) Ex-post evaluation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund (EGF) 2014-2020.
(7) Council Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2020/2093.
(8) Interinstitutional Agreements on Better Law-Making.
(9) Interinstitutional Agreement of 16 December 2020.
(10) Regulation (EU) 2021/691.
(11) SWD(2018) 192 final, page 34.

The EGF builds on its predecessor under the 2014-2020 multiannual financial framework. In particular, it remains outside the budgetary ceiling of the multiannual financial framework given the non-programmable nature of its mandate. The maximum amount for the 2021–2027 period is set at almost EUR 1.467 billion in current prices.
For the 2021-2027 multiannual financial framework, the EGF was redesigned to ensure greater inclusiveness and flexibility to better respond to current and future economic challenges, such as automation and digitalisation, the transition to low‑carbon economy, etc. Therefore, its scope has been broadened to any type of significant restructuring event regardless of the cause, and the eligibility threshold has been lowered from 500 to 200 displaced workers. Moreover, the EGF co-financing rate has been aligned with the highest European Social Fund Plus co‑financing rate in the respective Member State.
Programme website:
Impact assessment:
- The impact assessment of the EGF was carried out in 2018.
- For further information please consult SWD(2018) 289 final.
Relevant regulation:
- Regulation (EU) 2021/691 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
- Biennial reports:
Every 2 years the Commission reports to the European Parliament and the Council on the activities of the EGF. The latest report (August 2023) covers the 2021-2022 period.
Evaluations:
- The midterm evaluation of the EGF 2014-2020 was published in 2018. For further information please consult SWD(2018) 192 final.
- The ex-post evaluation of the EGF 2014-2020 was published in 2021. For further information please consult SWD(2021) 381) final (12).
- To improve monitoring of the EGF, a beneficiary survey will be conducted at the end of each intervention. By means of the survey, the broader impacts of the EGF on beneficiaries’ general employability, such as the acquisition of new skills, gain of self-confidence, increased motivation, etc. will be measured.
- The midterm evaluation of the EGF 2021-2027 is due by mid-2025 and is expected to offer first insights on the fund’s performance.
(12) SWD/2021/381 final.
Budget
Budget programming (million EUR):
[notranslate]EGFWeb:budg_02:table[/notranslate]
Budget performance – implementation
Cumulative implementation rate at the end of 2023 (million EUR):
[notranslate]EGFWeb:budg_03:table[/notranslate]
Voted budget implementation (million EUR)(1):
[notranslate]EGFWeb:budg_04:table[/notranslate]
– In 2021, five applications, submitted at the end of 2020 by five Member States, were adopted. As a result, they were paid out partly from assigned revenues from the 2014-2020 period and partly from the budget allocated for 2021-2027. Four of these applications were submitted in relation to the repercussions of the COVID-19 crisis, and one application was linked to a trade-related restructuring event.
– The new EGF regulation for 2021-2027 only entered into force in May 2021 but it has been applied retroactively since 1 January of that year. A derogation clause was therefore introduced to ensure that funding gaps would be avoided. In 2021, eight applications were submitted by four Member States, requesting a total of EUR 18 million to assist 740 dismissed workers. In four cases, the COVID-19 pandemic was the main factor that led to the dismissals. Three cases had a trade-related background and one had crisis. The EGF was mobilised in 2021 in four cases while the rest, received in the second half of 2021, benefited from EGF support in the first half of 2022. In 2022, three applications were submitted by three Member States, requesting a total of EUR 21 million to assist 2 442 dismissed workers. The first case had the COVID-19 pandemic as the main factor that led to the dismissals, the second was due to a company take-over and the third one had a trade-related background. Only one case was mobilised in 2022 (EUR 17.7 million), while the remaining two benefited from EGF support in the first half of 2023 (EUR 3.2 million). In 2023, four applications were submitted by three Member States, requesting a total of EUR 9.8 million to assist 2 249 dismissed workers. The main factor that led to the dismissals was bankruptcy for two of the cases and trade for the other two. Two cases were mobilised (EUR 4.98 million). The other two received in November-December 2023 will be put forward to the Budgetary Authority in the first quarter of 2024.
– The low number of EGF applications after 2020 has been a surprise to the Commission. During the EGF Contact Persons meeting that took place on 24 November 2022, participants were invited to share their thoughts on the low uptake of the EGF in the current programming period. The principal reason behind the low number of applications is the good situation on national labour markets, often with many unfilled vacancies. Jobs have been preserved thanks to the measures to maintain them, such as short-term work schemes. Also, there is currently a lot of funding available to absorb from other EU programmes like the REACT-EU, which was oftentimes easier to access or offered more favourable conditions. Furthermore, considerable support was available to keep people in employment during the pandemic, which contributed to the underutilisation of the EGF. Furthermore, several countries are faced with administrative overload due to the launch of the 2021-2027 European Social Fund Plus programmes. The EGF and the European Social Fund Plus are usually implemented by the same managing authorities and have limited capacity to concentrate on possible EGF applications due to the European Social Fund Plus negotiations.
– Despite the economic recovery and declining inflation (although still higher than before),, uncertainty persists, in relation to (i) geopolitical instability, (ii) the persistence of supply chain bottlenecks and (iii) the economic consequences of the EU sanctions against Russia over Ukraine.
– As an emergency response tool, the EGF will be ready to react to these challenges and to help in possible further major restructuring events in 2024, if needed.
Contribution to horizontal priorities
Green budgeting
Contribution to green budgeting priorities (million EUR):
[notranslate]EGFWeb:budg_05:table[/notranslate]
Not applicable to the EGF
Gender
Contribution to gender equality (million EUR) (*):
[notranslate]EGFWeb:budg_06:table[/notranslate]
The EGF regulation provides for the Commission and the Member States to ensure that equality between men and women and the integration of the gender perspective are integral parts of and promoted during all stages of the implementation of the financial contribution from the EGF. To that end, the Member States formally confirm the respect of this principle at the time of application, when they provide gender-disaggregated information on the workers targeted for assistance. In case of doubt, the Commission requests that Member States provide further information on the gender aspect in the course of its assessment of an application. This is, however, a general principle applied across the implementation and final reporting of the EGF cases, and estimating budget contributions is not relevant. Evaluations of the EGF always include an analysis of both gender disaggregated data and qualitative information (beneficiary surveys, interview with implementers, etc.) regarding possible gender discrimination. In the course of EGF evaluations, external contractors conduct case studies on each EGF case, and they are also asked to take the gender perspective into account. Past evaluations did not detect gender discrimination in either the delivery of measures or the targeting of beneficiaries. Moreover, in many cases, authorities aim to help participants overcome gender stereotypes when looking for a new job.
Between 2014 and 2016, the greatest number of redundant workers benefiting from EGF support came from sectors that traditionally employ more men than women (automotive, computing, electronics, machinery and building construction). As a consequence, most workers made redundant and then targeted by EGF applications were male (75% men versus 25% women). However, from 2017, a significant number of redundancies took place in sectors that employ high numbers of women (retail trade, call centres, clothing, financial services and tourism-related activities). Therefore, 57% of those targeted by the EGF between 2017 and 2020 were men and 43% were women. In 31% of all EGF cases, women represent at least 40% of the dismissed/targeted workers, and in 20% of cases they represent more than 50%.
Between 2021 and 2022, many redundancies occurred in sectors that employ a high proportion of men (metalworking, air transport, manufacture of motor vehicles, transport equipment, electrical equipment), hence 65% of those targeted by the EGF were men and 35% were women.
Digital
Contribution to digital transition (million EUR):
[notranslate]EGFWeb:budg_07:table[/notranslate]
The EGF does not have any indicators that specifically measure the contribution to the digital transition. The indicators are general result indicators. However, the dissemination of digital skills is a horizontal element for the design of coordinated packages of measures. The need for and level of training is adapted to the qualifications and skills of each beneficiary. In theory, every beneficiary is thus expected to have received some sort of digital skills training.
Budget performance – outcomes
[notranslate]EGFWeb:budg_09:table[/notranslate]
Link to file with complete set of EU core performance indicators
- The main sources of information on the EGF’s results are (1) the final reports submitted by the Member States, 7 months after the end of implementation, and (2) the beneficiary surveys, which are conducted 6 months after the implementation of the case.
- Even though the EGF’s main aim is sustainable reintegration into quality employment, the mere comparison of reintegration rates is not sufficient to measure the performance of the EGF. This is due, among other reasons, to differences in the characteristics of the beneficiaries targeted and in the socioeconomic situations of the regions affected. Therefore, beneficiary surveys were introduced as a new tool in the 2021-2027 period. Beneficiary surveys will help assess the extent to which the assistance offered had an impact on the perceived change in the employability of beneficiaries or, for those who have already found employment, on the quality of the employment found (e.g. in terms of changes in working hours). Such information will be broken down by gender, age group, education level and level of professional experience. Furthermore, by broadening the scope of the EGF and by making the application procedure easier and faster in the current programming period, the fund is expected to be more inclusive and to reach more displaced workers in need of assistance.
- Considering the delayed start of the 2021-2027 programming period, and taking into account that the implementation of an EGF case takes 24 months, the aforementioned information, which is necessary to assess the EGF’s performance, is only expected by mid 2024. In 2022, the Commission mobilised assistance for the natural disaster applications received in 2021.
Sustainable development goals
Contribution to the sustainable development goals
SDGs the programme contributes to | Example |
---|---|
SDG4 Ensure inclusive and equitable quality education and promote lifelong learning opportunities for all | In the 2019 ‘Goodyear’ EGF case in Germany, 60% of the workers offered the assistance had no suitable qualification and used to hold elementary occupations (including a high number of people with migrant background). Backed by EGF with EUR 2 165 231, one third of 622 beneficiaries upskilled and improved their employment level. Overall, 58% of the workers had found a new job while the other 5% were participating in upskilling measures for a longer duration (e.g., getting a vocational qualification), by the reporting date. |
SDG5 Achieve gender equality and empower all women and girls | The EGF is helping to achieve gender equality by providing support to all dismissed workers. Since 2017, a significant number of redundancies took place in sectors with high numbers of employed women (retail trade, call centre, wearing apparel, financial services, and tourism-related activities). For example, in the 2017 ‘Retail’ case in Finland 1 173 women (representing 80% of total beneficiaries) were helped by EGF. EUR 2.5 million were mobilised from the EGF to support the ICT and language training, job and career coaching and job-seeking training. Overall, 84% of the beneficiaries had found a new job at the end of the implementation period. |
SDG8 Promote sustained, inclusive and sustainable economic growth, full and productive employment and decent work for all | In NUTS 2 level regions where youth unemployment rates are at least 20%, the EGF may provide personalised services to young people not in employment, education, or training. For example, in cases implemented between 2017 and 2019 in Belgium (‘Caterpillar’ case, 1 931 beneficiaries and EUR 1.6 million of EGF funding mobilised), and in Spain (Castilla y León mining of coal case, 396 beneficiaries and EUR 1 million of EGF funding mobilised), the support offered to the young people provided them with the assistance that they would not have received through national mainstream services. |
SDG10 Reduce inequalities within and among countries | The EGF is an emergency fund and is only mobilised in redundancy events that have a significant impact on the regional economy. By offering upskilling measures to workers made redundant, the EGF helps regions to offer measures to make their workers ready for future labour market needs, thereby fostering economic growth. Some EGF cases include measures that improve labour mobility of displaced workers. For instance, in the ‘Microsoft 2’ case in Finland (883 beneficiaries and EUR 3.5 million of EGF funding mobilised) implemented between 2017 and 2019 the measures offered to the dismissed workers supported labour mobility in cooperation with the European Job Mobility Portal (EURES) services (i.e., foreign job advertisements and the exchange of experiences in online meetings) |